{"id":18181,"date":"2015-01-21T11:00:51","date_gmt":"2015-01-21T11:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/enterprisestrategies.com\/?p=18181"},"modified":"2015-07-24T14:34:16","modified_gmt":"2015-07-24T14:34:16","slug":"effectiveness-of-the-intranet-providing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/enterprisestrategies.com\/2015\/01\/21\/effectiveness-of-the-intranet-providing\/","title":{"rendered":"Intranets Reimagined: What content are your employees most interested in?"},"content":{"rendered":"
In partnership with the\u00a0Worldwide Intranet Challenge<\/a><\/span><\/strong>, we\u2019ve applied econometric principles to the results of over 200 intranet surveys and\u00a0statistically pinpointed <\/strong>which types of intranet content<\/em>\u00a0most impact a user\u2019s perception of their intranet.\u00a0This fourth post in the series is focused on the data analysis of \u00a0\u201ccontent \u201d factors \u2014\u00a0showing which intranet content<\/em> types\u00a0have the biggest impact on how employees\u00a0view their company\u2019s intranet.<\/strong><\/p>\n Want\u00a0to anonymously benchmark your company’s intranet? \u00a0Learn more and register to participate in the Worldwide Intranet Challenge\u00a0here<\/a><\/span><\/strong>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n [vc_separator type=’transparent’ position=’center’ color=” thickness=’10’ up=” down=”]<\/p>\n [vc_separator type=’transparent’ position=’center’ color=” thickness=’2′ up=” down=”]<\/p>\n In this download, you will find the following information:<\/p>\n [vc_separator type=’transparent’ position=’center’ color=” thickness=’5′ up=” down=”]<\/p>\nGet Your Free Download<\/a>\n [vc_separator type=’transparent’ position=’center’ color=” thickness=’30’ up=” down=”]<\/p>\n A commonly used definition for\u00a0intranets<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>is “an internal website that employees use to find the people and information they need to do their job.” We agree, and in fact, our study indicated with 99+% confidence, that an employee’s ability to find “staff details” has\u00a0one of the greatest positive\u00a0impacts on\u00a0their perception of the value of their company’s intranet.<\/p>\n While not a component of our survey data, our observations from working with clients around the world have also confirmed that “social data” (e.g., an employee’s internal social network activity stream, blog posts, group contributions and even badges) are fast becoming an expected part of an employee’s people directory listing. It is no longer acceptable just to be able to view a person’s contact information and where they fit on the org chart. Additionally, our client interactions suggest that not only is a\u00a0company’s employee directory their\u00a0intranet’s killer app, it is also a company’s\u00a0mobile intranet killer app. In several of the intranet assessments<\/a><\/strong><\/span> and group discovery sessions we’ve conducted over the last year, when asked what intranet information employees would like to be able to access via mobile, the employee directory is almost always listed first and as most important.<\/p>\n Our study also concluded, with a 99+% confidence,\u00a0<\/b>that\u00a0the effectiveness of the intranet in providing news about the your organization as well as\u00a0quick access to\u00a0policies & procedures all increase the value that your employees place on your company\u2019s intranet. However, our recent client interactions also confirm the need for intranet teams to provide these items in a way that aligns to how people currently work.<\/p>\n For example, having a text heavy company news article front and center on your homepage\u00a0is informative, but not as effective (widely read and understood) as presenting this information to employees as a thin screen (screen overlay) on their smart phone or by using a “content container” delivery system such as Citia<\/a><\/strong> <\/span>provides. It is also expected that policies and procedures not just be presented on the intranet, but where appropriate, be actionable on the intranet. In other words, “don’t just tell me what I need to do, give me the facility to then do it without leaving the intranet.”<\/p>\n Our study also concluded, with 95% confidence, that the effectiveness in how your intranet provides training increases an\u00a0employee’s valuation of the company intranet. Again further discussion with clients confirm that “having a link to a corporate training system” is not enough. Training is expected in multiple, less traditional, forms and formats:<\/p>\n <\/i><\/span> inline\u00a0videos explaining a new development or concept<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/i><\/span> embedded social network discussions to allow for the asking and answering of questions<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/i><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>game-ified processes that teach, and reinforce concepts, through doing<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Some companies, like Marsh, Inc., a 126 year-old insurance brokerage, have even gone as far as taking the concept of centralized knowledge management and turning it on its head<\/a> <\/strong><\/span>— using the intranet as a platform for decentralized, dynamic (bi-directional discussion), social-network-driven, knowledge capture and management. Compare this to the traditional static page explaining one of your company’s products or services (with a name of who to\u00a0call for more info) and it does not take much imagination to see the benefits gained.<\/p>\n So what are\u00a0some of the types of content that did not fair so well in our analysis?\u00a0<\/strong>Our study found that the effectiveness in providing calendars<\/b> and a repository of re-usable documents <\/b>were actually significant negative influences\u00a0when it came to an\u00a0employee’s valuation of their intranet. Does this mean that you should avoid having them on your intranet? Honestly, I do not think it does. As I mentioned in one of our previous posts on this study<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, “very few studies\u00a0are perfect.” My interpretation of these two findings is that intranets where calendars and document repositories are\u00a0key functions are\u00a0likely older intranets — as these are\u00a0two features that were emphasized early in the evolution of intranets.\u00a0In other words, I would view these two findings as indicators that the intranet being referred to, and anonymously benchmarked as part of this study, may have been a bit outdated and in need of a redesign — which could in fact\u00a0account for the user’s less than terrific perception of its overall value.<\/p>\n<\/a>Free Download: What Your Employees Want From Your Intranet<\/h2>\n
\n
Your\u00a0Employee Directory is your Intranets\u00a0“Killer App”<\/h3>\n
Employees want to know what their colleagues know and they also want proof to substantiate the skills and expertise listed.<\/h5><\/blockquote>\u00a0This makes sense as I think we would all agree that\u00a0we have come to expect this in our personal lives. When is the last time you made a purchase with out reading an online review first? It is only natural that\u00a0we\u00a0would want this same ability at work.<\/p>\n
Company News and Policies &\u00a0Procedures, Still Important but Improved Delivery Expected<\/h3>\n
Intranets can and should be both “modern day” training and knowledge management applications<\/h3>\n
Not all types of intranet content have a positive impact on a user’s perception of their intranet<\/h3>\n
Join the discussion<\/h3>\n