{"id":1237,"date":"2012-05-15T08:30:21","date_gmt":"2012-05-15T12:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/enterprisestrategies.com\/?p=1237"},"modified":"2015-07-27T17:56:10","modified_gmt":"2015-07-27T17:56:10","slug":"how-klout-could-transform-internal-social-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/enterprisestrategies.com\/2012\/05\/15\/how-klout-could-transform-internal-social-media\/","title":{"rendered":"How Klout Could Transform Enterprise Social Media"},"content":{"rendered":"
Clout used to be a vague term that referred to someone\u2019s influence in general. You could have a lot of clout in certain circles, some clout in general or no clout at all. It was fuzzy and that was fine. That was before Klout. Now \u2014 whether you spell it with a \u201cc\u201d or with a \u201ck\u201d \u2014 clout is a number and is an often-trusted measurement of your online influence.<\/p>\n
Klout believers include Cathay Pacific Airways, which recently launched<\/a> a score-based perk program in the international terminal at San Francisco International Airport. Anyone with a Klout score of 40 or higher is allowed into the airline\u2019s exclusive lounge, where showers, workstations and a noodle bar will keep online influencers happy.<\/p>\n As with most things that are loved by many, there are active dissenters such as Klouchebag<\/a>. Some might say it\u2019s sour grapes for those who make a case against Klout, but it\u2019s hard to argue that a high Klout score is important for everyone. In fact, I would argue that it most certainly isn\u2019t. (Today, I\u2019m edging out the Aflac duck by two Klout points. Is that really an important comparison?)<\/p>\n